Hertsmere Borough Council (24 015 764)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about parking in the complainant’s street. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, is unhappy with the Council’s response after he reported parking problems in his street.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X. This includes the complaint replies. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X contacted the Council to complain about the way people park in his street. Mr X has highlighted grass verge parking and that some households take up a lot of the communal on-street parking because they have many cars.
  2. In response the Council explained that grass verge parking is not prohibited and there are no parking restrictions in the street. The Council said it cannot take any enforcement action due to the absence of parking restrictions and it has decided that it is not necessary to introduce any restrictions.
  3. I appreciate Mr X is dissatisfied with the Council’s response but I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The Council explained why it cannot take any action and said it does not think any restrictions are needed. Mr X may disagree but that does not mean the Council has done anything wrong.
  4. Mr X could contact his local councillors and campaign for restrictions to be added. But it would be for the Council to decide whether to make any changes and to assess whether the majority of residents share Mr X’s views.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings