Transport for London (24 014 670)

Category : Transport and highways > Traffic management

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 29 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about Transport for London charging her for driving in the congestion charge outside chargeable hours. This is because the injustice claimed (£15) is not significant enough to warrant investigation.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Ms X, complains Transport for London (TfL) has charged her £15 for driving in the congestion charge zone based on records and images which show she drove in the zone outside of chargeable hours.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. To ensure payment is made for any journeys inside the congestion charge zone, TfL operates an ‘autopay’ system where motorists can sign up to pay the charge, when it is due, automatically. Ms X has signed up for this service and TfL charged her £15 for driving in the zone.
  2. However, Ms X says the time stamp on the images showing her driving in the congestion charge zone reads 18:05, which is outside chargeable hours. TfL says this is an internal issue related to the change from British Summer Time to Greenwich Mean Time and that Ms X actually drove in the congestion charge zone at 17:05. Ms X disputes the integrity of TfL’s data and wants it to refund her payment and ensure the time stamp and TfL’s records show the correct time.
  3. We do not investigate all the complaints we receive. In deciding whether to investigate we need to consider various tests. These include the alleged injustice to the person complaining. We only investigate the most serious complaints.
  4. I appreciate Ms X is frustrated and believes she may have been charged unnecessarily, but the amount of the charge (£15) is not significant enough to warrant further investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because TfL’s actions have not caused Ms X significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings