London Borough of Southwark (24 018 652)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint that the Council wrongly issued her with a Penalty Charge Notice for an alleged parking contravention. This is because it is reasonable for Ms B to put in an appeal to London Tribunals.

The complaint

  1. Ms B complains the Council wrongly issued her with a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) for a parking contravention. Ms B says the signage in this location was not clear and she paid for parking in good faith.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The Act says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. London Tribunals considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. There is a process set out in law for a motorist to formally challenge a PCN. This involves the motorist putting in formal representations to the local authority, and if needed, putting in an appeal to London Tribunals (for authorities in London). We generally expect this process to be used. The tribunal is independent and has the power to cancel a PCN.
  2. The Council has considered Ms B’s informal representations against this PCN. If Ms B wants to challenge this PCN further she may wait to receive a Notice to Owner before putting in formal representations to the Council.
  3. If the Council rejects Ms B’s formal representations, she may put in an appeal to London Tribunals. I find it is reasonable for Ms B to use this process to challenge this PCN.
  4. So, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms B’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to put in an appeal to London Tribunals.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings