London Borough of Havering (24 017 664)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 30 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the amount of a Penalty Charge Notice because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, says the Council did not re-offer the discounted rate for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) after he made representations. He also complains the Council did not tell him about a change in policy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes the complaint correspondence. I also considered information on the PCN, the Council’s website and our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Following a consultation, the Council decided in July 2024 not to re-offer the discount for a PCN when someone challenges a PCN. The consultation and policy decision were explained on the Council’s website; all PCNs since July have included the following statement: “any challenge made is against the full charge and the 14 day discount will not be offered.”
  2. Mr X received a PCN in August. The discounted rate of £65. Mr X challenged the fine and thought the Council would re-offer the discounted rate if rejected. The Council rejected the challenge and, in line with the new policy, said the fine was £130.
  3. Mr X did not pay so the Council issued a charge certificate and the fine increased to £130. Mr X paid £130 but says the Council should make a refund and reduce the fine to £65. He says the Council did not publicise the new rules and did not respond to his enquiry.
  4. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The law does not require councils to re-offer the discount. The Council used to re-offer it but changed the policy last year. The consultation and decision were publicised and the new rules are stated on the PCN and on the website. I appreciate Mr X was unaware of the new policy, but the changes were advertised and the information is stated on each PCN. Mr X says the Council did not respond to an enquiry but he could have paid £130 and then continued with an enquiry or complaint and sought a refund if his complaint was upheld.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings