Birmingham City Council (24 015 746)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a Penalty Charge notice because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complained the Council wrongly issued and pursued her for a Penalty Charge Notice (PCN) despite her having bought a ticket in a pay and display car park.
  2. Miss Y says she has felt very distressed and upset and has been contacted by enforcement agents.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone has a right of appeal, reference or review to a tribunal about the same matter. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to use this right. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The Traffic Penalty Tribunal considers parking and moving traffic offence appeals for all areas of England outside London.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss Y received a PCN from the Council after she parked in a pay and display car park. Miss Y says she bought a ticket; however, the Council says this was not displayed and it consequently issued a PCN. Miss Y says she has now been contacted by enforcement agents about the penalty.
  2. Miss Y has a right to submit a witness statement to the Traffic Enforcement Centre (TEC),based at Northampton County Court, asking it to remove the charge certificate for the PCN. She can do this, even if she has already paid the enforcement agents under duress. If the TEC accepts Miss Y’s application to remove the charge certificate, which is the registration of the penalty debt with the court, it can take the process back to an earlier stage. It can also choose to reduce the amount of the PCN back to a lower amount and reinstate Miss Y’s right of appeal against it to the Council initially, if she did not use this previously and then the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. Miss Y can then decide if she wishes to appeal the PCN or pay the penalty.
  3. This is free in the initial stages and reasonable adjustments can be made where necessary for access to the service. Forms for this can be found online. Consequently, as Miss Y has not provided any other reason why she cannot, it is reasonable to expect her to use this right to appeal. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because it is reasonable to expect Miss Y to appeal to the Traffic Enforcement Centre and the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings