Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council (24 010 258)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to take action against her neighbours for driving over raised kerbs. This is because the issue does not cause Miss X significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complains the Council is allowing her neighbours to drive over raised kerbs to access their driveways. She says this is dangerous and damages the highway and underground utilities. She also believes it is unfair as the Council threatened her with prosecution if she continued. As a result she applied and paid for a vehicle crossover/dropped kerb and is frustrated that the Council has allowed other residents to get away with not having to do this.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We do not investigate all the complaints we receive. In deciding whether to investigate we need to consider various tests. These include the alleged injustice to the person complaining. We only investigate the most serious complaints.
  2. I understand that Miss X is frustrated the Council has not taken formal action against her neighbours but I have seen nothing to show this causes her significant injustice. Her safety concerns relate to vehicles crossing the pavement, whether there is a dropped kerb or not, and any benefit to her neighbours from not having to apply is not an injustice to her.
  3. The pavement and kerbs, whether dropped or not, belong to the Council and it is responsible for their maintenance. So if Miss X believes vehicles have damaged them she should report her concerns to the Council in the first instance. The Council will then decide whether it is out of repair and, if so, what action it should take. Miss X may also report any damage to the utilities which run underneath the pavement to the relevant provider.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because the actions Miss X complains about have not caused her significant enough injustice to warrant investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings