Essex County Council (24 013 004)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 21 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to investigate Mrs X’s concerns about highway land next to her property. The complaint is late, and we have seen no reason to exercise discretion and investigate now.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the Council failed to investigate or provide information about her highway concerns. She says this caused her unnecessary stress and financial loss. She wants an apology and compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Several years ago, Mrs X made enquiries about a ditch on her boundary. The Council provided information. Mrs X says the information she received was conflicting and she made further enquiries.
  2. In 2023 the Council inspected the site and confirmed the existence of a ditch on the site. It also advised

“where there is a roadside ditch or pond, that ditch or pond (even if it has been piped or infilled) would not in the majority of circumstances form part of the highway. Often, roadside ditches, which are apparent on the ground are not indicated on the Ordnance Survey Mapping. It is advised that further clarification in this regard is sought where the boundary could be affected by the presence of an historic ditch as this may be crucial when determining available land for highway works, visibility, and the placement of boundary features such as fences, walls, or hedges.”

  1. The Council also says Mrs X’s consultant informed officers that they make an application to stop up the highway under Section 116/117 of The Highways Act 1980. However, the Council did not receive an application.
  2. The Council told Mrs X in 2023 that land to the rear of an existing ditch on the ground would not be subject to public highway rights, therefore no stopping up order would be required for the land in question.
  3. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction because it is late. The law says a complaint should be made to us within 12 months of the person affected first becoming aware of the matter. Mrs X was clearly aware of the matter some years ago, and I see no good reasons to exercise discretion to consider it now.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint. It is late and I see no good reasons to exercise discretion to consider it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings