Somerset Council (24 002 882)

Category : Transport and highways > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 09 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to install an ‘H-bar’ marking on the road outside his property. This is because the Council’s decision does not cause Mr X significant injustice.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains the Council has refused to install an ‘H-bar’ marking on the public highway outside his property to prevent inconsiderate motorists from obstructing access to his driveway via a dropped kerb.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. While H-bar markings can warn motorists of the need to keep access-ways clear they are not legally enforceable. Councils have the power to issue penalty charge notices where vehicles are obstructing a dropped kerb but it can do this with or without an H-bar marking in the road.
  2. While Mr X believes an H-bar marking would improve the situation for him I do not consider the Council’s refusal to install one causes him significant injustice. This is because Mr X’s injustice stems from the inconsiderate actions of motorists and the installation of an H-bar marking neither prevents such actions nor gives the Council any additional powers to deal with them.
  3. If Mr X believes cars have obstructed his driveway he may report this to the Council and, if possible, its parking enforcement contractor may be able to visit to determine whether it can issue a penalty charge notice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint. This is because there is not enough evidence to show the Council’s actions have caused Mr X significant injustice.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings