Devon County Council (24 017 597)

Category : Transport and highways > Highway repair and maintenance

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council maintains the highway on a road near where Mrs X lives. This is because Mrs X has an alternative legal remedy that can consider her complaint and if necessary, require the Council to take action. Therefore, it would be reasonable to expect Mrs X to use this alternative remedy.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X said she was affected by the deterioration of the road surface near her home. She said this was because of a lack of effective maintenance by the Council and wants the Council to take action to address the poor road surface.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In this case, Mrs X said the road is not in a suitable state of repair and has reported this to the Council. The Council said it has periodically inspected the road and does not believe there is a need for any additional work, because there was no safety defect. It also said it was carrying out repairs across its area, based upon the priority of the need.
  2. In such cases, where a person, considers that a highways authority has failed to maintain a highway it is responsible for, the person affected (Mrs X) can apply to the Magistrates court for an order to be made under section 56 of the Highways Act 1980. This order requires the highways authority to carry out the work needed to the highway.
  3. Mrs X may use this process to try to get the Council to repair the road if she believes there is a requirement. There might be some cost to court action, however, that does not mean it is unreasonable to take court action. This is because it is they who could decide whether the Council has met its legal duty to maintain the highway. Also, unlike the Ombudsman, the court can order the Council to do the required work, so it is better placed than us to consider the complaint. We will therefore not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is an alternative legal remedy and under the circumstances, it would be reasonable to expect Mrs X to use it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings