London Borough of Bromley (24 017 171)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about matters related to the Council’s data handling. This is because it is reasonable to expect Miss X to take the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office for its consideration.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains about matters related to the Council’s data handling, namely data breaches, poor record keeping and access to information issues.
  2. She also complains about the Council’s handling of her subject access request. She says it failed to support her through the process as per its policies or respond in a timely manner, gave outdated leaflets, and used stigmatised terms in its documents.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  3. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  4. The Information Commissioner's Office considers complaints about freedom of information. Its decision notices may be appealed to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights). So where we receive complaints about freedom of information, we normally consider it reasonable to expect the person to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate any complaints about matters related to the Council’s data handling. This is because it is reasonable to expect Miss X to take the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Officer (ICO). It is the appropriate body to review complaints about data protection.
  2. It would not be a good use of public money to investigate matters related to the Council’s handling of Miss X’s request in isolation when I will not investigate the substantive issue.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because it is reasonable for her to complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings