Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council (24 016 165)

Category : Other Categories > Leisure and culture

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to suspend Mr X’s membership at a leisure facility. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision making.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained because the Council refused to temporarily suspend his membership at a leisure facility after he asked it to. Mr X said because the Council asked for further information about his reasons, this left him feeling insulted.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X asked the Council to temporarily suspend his membership at a leisure facility, saying this was because he was not going to be able to use it for several months. Mr X gave a reason why he was asking the Council to do this.
  2. The Council acknowledged Mr X’s request and asked him to provide it with additional information supporting his request. Mr X declined saying the Council’s request was unnecessary.
  3. The Council then highlighted the relevant section on Mr X’s recent application for membership, that allowed it to request this information, to decide whether it agreed to a temporary suspension. It also offered to meet Mr X to take his information, if he wants to provide it in the future.
  4. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. Whilst I can understand Mr X’s may be reluctant to provide the information the Council has asked for, there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision to place this as a condition within its terms for membership and then follow those terms in Mr X’s case.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings