Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (24 013 059)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about loss and damage caused to Ms X’s belongings by a removal company paid by the Council using a Discretionary Housing Payment. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that a removal company organised through a Council Discretionary Housing Payment lost, damaged and stole some of her personal belongings when she moved home. She says neither the Council nor the removal company has taken responsibility for this.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council, including its response to the complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council paid for a removal company to move Ms X’s belongings to her new property using a Discretionary Housing Payment. When Ms X complained to the Council that some of her property had been lost and damaged it contacted the removal company and a damaged item was replaced and a missing item was found.
  2. However, it explained to Ms X that while it had settled the invoice for the removal, it was not responsible for the removal company’s actions and that the contract was between her and the company.
  3. While this is a disappointing decision for Ms X, there is no evidence to suggest there has been fault by the Council. If Ms X wishes to continue her claim in relation to lost and damaged property, she can pursue this with the removal company. If she believes property was stolen, she can report this to the police.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings