London Borough of Hillingdon (24 011 528)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 13 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to accept her application for improved banding on the housing register. This is because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council failed to properly consider her application for the housing register. She says it failed to correctly consider her medical evidence and her living conditions. Ms X says the impact of this refusal is impacting her mental health.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint. I refer to this as ‘injustice’. If there has been fault which has caused significant injustice, or that could cause injustice to others in the future we may suggest a remedy.

(Local Government Act 1974, sections 26(1) and 26A(1), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If we investigated this complaint, it is likely we would find the Council at fault. It has failed to evidence its rationale or decision making behind why Ms X was not eligible to join the housing register based on having a medical need to move.
  2. We therefore invited the Council to consider remedying the injustice caused by its actions by completing a further medical assessment. It should also provide a clear rationale to Ms X regarding its subsequent decision based on this assessment.

Back to top

Agreed Action

  1. To its credit, the Council agreed to resolve the complaint and will complete the above within four weeks of the final decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld this complaint because the Council has agreed to resolve the complaint early by providing a proportionate remedy for the injustice caused.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings