Bristol City Council (24 005 562)

Category : Housing > Allocations

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about her housing register priority banding. Since bringing her complaint to us, the Council has reassessed Ms X’s application. If Ms X is dissatisfied with the reassessment, it is reasonable for her to request a review.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council has refused to increase her housing priority banding to band one on medical grounds. She says her current housing is unsuitable and causing distress. She wants the Council to increase her priority banding or provide her a direct offer of a suitable property.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide it would be reasonable for the person to ask for a council review or appeal.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X applied to the Council for re-housing. The Council accepted her onto its housing register and awarded her priority band three. Ms X was dissatisfied with this decision and requested a review. The Council reviewed its decision in June 2023 and in January 2024, but did not change her priority banding. Ms X was dissatisfied with this decision and brought the complaint to us.
  2. The Council has since reassessed her application and increased her priority banding to band two. The decision letter explains the reasons for its decision for increasing her priority to band two and why she does not meet the criteria for band one. It also backdated her band two priority to June 2023. It states if she remains dissatisfied, she can request a review of the reassessment decision.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint. Since bringing her complaint to us, the Council has reassessed Ms X’s application and reached a new decision. If Ms X is dissatisfied with the new decision, it is reasonable for her to request the Council complete a review.

Back to top

Final decision

We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because if she disagrees with the new decision, it is reasonable for her to ask the Council for a review.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings