Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (24 016 406)

Category : Environment and regulation > Refuse and recycling

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 24 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about the Council leaving refuse bins on her drive. This is because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains about the refuse collections for her property. She says the Council keep leaving bins on her driveway, blocking it. She says that she has raised this to the Council, but it has not prevented the issue from reoccurring.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mrs X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs X complains that after refuse collections, bins were left blocking her driveway. The Council in its stage one response upheld her complaint, apologised and raised the matter with a supervisor for the refuse collectors.
  2. After Mrs X reported the issue again, the Council escalated the matter to a collection manager. It said the crew would be called in for a meeting to discuss their performance. It also stated that a supervisor would be responsible for monitoring collections until they are satisfied the crew was following the correct process for emptying bins. Also, a waste officer would carry out periodic monitoring to ensure the supervisor is fulfilling their obligations.
  3. The Council said that if the issue persisted, after these interventions, it would carry out a long-term period of intensive monitoring.
  4. Although I note that Mrs X is unhappy with the response from the Council, I consider its actions to be appropriate in the circumstances. It follows that any investigation is unlikely to add to the Council’s or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because an investigation is unlikely to add to that already carried out by the Council or lead to a different outcome.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings