London Borough of Camden (24 015 737)

Category : Environment and regulation > Licensing

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 25 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision not to take enforcement action regarding breaches to a house in multiple occupation licence as there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Mrs X complains the freeholder of her property has breached the house in multiple occupation (HMO) licence the Council granted to them, but the Council has refused to take enforcement action. Mrs X says this has put residents at risk.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In the Council's view, the reported issues with the property did not constitute a breach of the HMO licence or reach the threshold at which enforcement action would be warranted.
  2. We can only question this decision if there was clear evidence of fault in the way it was made. I consider there is insufficient evidence of such fault to warrant our further action, as the Council considered the concerns Mrs X and a neighbour raised and carried out a site visit. I recognise Mrs X disputes the Council’s assessment, but this does not equate to it being at fault. The Council came to a decision it is entitled to, under its enforcement policy, and we cannot intervene.
  3. For this reason, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of Council fault to warrant our further action.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings