Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (24 011 712)

Category : Environment and regulation > Drainage

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about drainage because the courts and insurers are better placed to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complained the Council has failed to prevent rainwater flowing from the park next to her property, causing damage to her property when there is heavy rainfall.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is another body better placed to consider this complaint. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mrs Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs Y says her property has been caused damage due to the poor drainage on the parkland next to her house owned by the Council. She says this has led to severe flooding in her garden, damp and mould in her home and she is concerned her home will be flooded whenever there is more rainfall.
  2. The Council has said the flooding was caused by significant heavy rainfall and not due to a lack of drainage in the park.
  3. The legislation from which the Ombudsman takes their power also places some restrictions on what we may investigate. One of these concerns negligence claims about damage to property or personal injury. We cannot determine liability claims for negligence. These are legal claims which may only be determined by insurers or the courts.
  4. We are not able to decide liability or award damages. Consequently, any claim for damages, such as costs for repairs to her property, which Mrs Y considers the Council to be responsible for, are matters more appropriately dealt with by the courts and the Council’s insurers. It is therefore reasonable for Mrs Y to pursue this claim through either the Council’s insurer or the courts. We will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y ’s complaint because there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings