Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council (24 005 020)

Category : Education > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 01 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a failure by the Council’s computer system to migrate details of Mr X’s business when it changed systems. The Council notified Mr X and other service users of the change and asked them to check and to report any problems.

The complaint

  1. Mr X said a fault in the Council’s computer system led to information about the businesses he and his wife ran being unavailable to potential clients, leading to a significant drop in income.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Changes in any computer system can raise glitches, even after testing. These sometimes only become apparent when the migration is live and service users access the system. We would expect the Council to tell those potentially affected by a change in a recording system in advance of the change, and to advise them to check and report any problems in function caused by the migration of data.
  2. In this case, the system involved information about businesses, including the ones run by Mr X and his wife. It is not disputed many clients used the information on the Council’s system to choose a provider. The correspondence I have seen indicates the Council told those affected, including Mr X and his wife, of the forthcoming change, and advised them to check and report any problems. It was then for those whose services were listed to check at first and again periodically, reporting any issues for the Council to rectify.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to warrant our further involvement.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings