East Sussex County Council (24 005 496)

Category : Children's care services > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 08 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the accuracy of a report completed by the Council. This is because Ms X can take the matter to the Information Commissioner’s Office, which is better placed to consider this complaint.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complained about the accuracy of a Council report. Ms X says the report contained inaccurate information about her.
  2. Ms X said the matter caused her distress.
  3. Ms X wants the Council to amend the report.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We normally expect someone to refer the matter to the Information Commissioner if they have a complaint about data protection, data processing, or a right to rectification request. However, we may decide to investigate if we think there are good reasons. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X complained the Council wrote a report which contained inaccurate information about her. Ms X asked the Council to amend the report.
  2. The Council made some changes to the report, but did not make all the changes Ms X requested.

Analysis

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint. This is because the issues complained about are about data processing, data accuracy, and about a “right to rectification”.
  2. Ms X has the right to ask the Council to “rectify” her records. This means any factual inaccuracies are corrected. If the Council refuses to do so, she can complain to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO). Parliament set up the ICO to consider data protection disputes which includes ‘right to rectification’ disputes and data processing matters. The ICO is better placed than the Ombudsman to consider if the Council should change its records. There are no good reasons the Ombudsman should consider the complaint instead. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the Information Commissioner’s Office is better placed to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings