Manchester City Council (24 016 937)
Category : Children's care services > Child protection
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 29 Jan 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Council child protection plan requirement made in March 2022. This is more than 12 months ago and there are no reasons the late complaint rule should not apply.
The complaint
- Mr X says the Council should not have had a child protection plan requirement of three days attending nursery. He says he incurred unnecessary costs.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- Mr X says the Council held a child protection conference for his family in March 2022. He says the conference recommended a requirement that his child attend a nursery for three days a week. He says there was only funding for two days. This meant he had to pay for the third day. He says a family member could have cared for the child free on that day.
- He complained to the Council in the Autumn of 2024. It said Mr X had complained to the conference at the time and had appealed to it. It referred Mr X back to the child protection conference complaints’ process.
- We cannot investigate complaints about events known to a complainant for more than 12 months unless there are good reasons to do so. There are no reasons to do so here.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman