Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the actions of the Council’s children’s services. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault with the Council’s decision not to consider Mr X’s complaint until court proceedings have concluded.

The complaint

1. Mr X complains about the actions of the Council’s children’s services in relation to child protection matters.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

3. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
4. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

5. The Council refused to consider Mr X’s complaint due to an ongoing criminal investigation relating to child protection matters.
6. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint at this time. This is because there is no evidence of fault in the Council’s decision not to investigate his complaint whilst court proceedings are in progress. Regulation 8 of The Children Act 1989 Representations Procedure (England) Regulations 2006 says councils can refuse to consider a complaint if to do so could prejudice concurrent a criminal investigation.
7. Mr X can resubmit his complaint once the proceedings have concluded. We will not consider the issues raised within the complaint until the complaints process has concluded.

Back to top

Final decision

8. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman