Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (24 006 391)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint about evidence a social worker provided to the court in family court proceedings because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about a social worker’s evidence to the family court. He says the social worker made false allegations of domestic abuse against him; misled the court in saying his children were not at risk of abuse due to alienation and misrepresented her professional experience. Mr X says this has had a detrimental impact on the proceedings and his family and the social worker’s actions amount to serious misconduct and a failure to uphold professional standards.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  3. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X complained to the Council about the evidence a social worker provided to the court in family court proceedings, as set out above.
  2. The Council told Mr X it could not consider his complaint as it had been decided in court proceedings.
  3. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction. The law prevents us from investigating complaints about matters that are being, or have been, considered in court proceedings. We have no discretion to do so. This restriction means we cannot consider complaints about evidence the Council has provided to the court.
  4. We cannot investigate allegations that a social worker is not meeting their professional standards of conduct. Complaints of this nature are considered by Social Work England as the regulatory body.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr X’s complaint because it lies outside our jurisdiction and the law says we cannot consider it.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings