West Northamptonshire Council (22 015 236)

Category : Children's care services > Child protection

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 14 May 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council's actions while she was a looked after child. There are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply. And we cannot investigate information given to a Court.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, whom I shall call Miss X, says the Council failed to care for her properly when she was a looked after child.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Miss X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss X is now 27. She says another Council began caring for her when she was around five years old. She says she then moved to live with a relative in this Council’s area. She says her care was not good enough. She says the Council did not properly liaise with CAMHS. She says she would like answers on why she feels no one cared about her treatment. She thought the Council was supposed to help her.
  2. Miss X also says she is involved in a court case about the care of her own children. She says the Council provided the Court with inaccurate information.

Analysis

  1. We cannot investigate the information the Council gave a Court.
  2. We should not dis-apply the late complaint rule in this case because it does not satisfy the following two tests:
    • I am not confident there is a realistic prospect of reaching a sound, fair, and meaningful decision. This is particularly so as it will be difficult to prove the material facts with reasonable confidence due to the age of events. It will be more difficult to gather enough evidence to reach a sound judgement. Even if some evidence is available, it would be problematic to ensure it is reliable, and provides a full picture. Given the time passed, it is going to be too difficult to show how Council fault directly caused Miss X’s an injustice. And,
    • I am not satisfied Miss X could not reasonably be expected to have complained sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because there are no good reasons the late complaint rule should not apply and we cannot investigate evidence given to a Court.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings