East Suffolk Council (24 019 226)
Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax
Decision : Closed after initial enquiries
Decision date : 05 Feb 2025
The Ombudsman's final decision:
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council charging a council tax premium for second homes. This is because the law says such decisions can only be challenged by judicial review.
The complaint
- Mr B complains the Council has wrongly decided to charge a 100% council tax premium on properties which are second homes.
The Ombudsman’s role and powers
- We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.
(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
How I considered this complaint
- I considered information provided by Mr B.
- I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
My assessment
- The Council’s decision to introduce this council tax premium is part of the council tax setting process undertaken by the Council. The law says such decisions can only be challenged by judicial review in the High Court (Paragraph 49, Schedule 7 Local Government Act 2003).
- So, we will not investigate a matter which the law does not allow us to investigate.
Final decision
- We will not investigate Mr B’s complaint because the law does not allow us to investigate this matter.
Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman