London Borough of Croydon (24 013 533)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her council tax account. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains the Council stopped her direct debit arrangement to repay council tax arrears in January 2024 without good reason and passed the debt to enforcement agents. She says this caused financial loss and distress. She wants the Council to stop the enforcement action.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its correspondence with Ms X, the Council told her that her bank had returned the direct debit to the Council as unpaid in January 2024. It said if she wanted to know the reason for this, she would need to contact her bank. As she had broken the agreed payment arrangement, it passed the debt to its enforcement agent at the end of January 2024.
  2. Following her contact in July 2024, the Council reviewed her account. It said it could see she had made a card payment for £200 in mid-January 2024, but that this had been allocated to the current year’s council tax bill. As she had clarified that this payment was towards the arrears, and as she had made it before it passed the debt to the enforcement agent, it agreed to recall the debt and reinstate her payment arrangement from September 2024. It removed all enforcement fees added to her account since January 2024.
  3. We will not investigate this complaint as there is insufficient evidence of fault. The Council has explained to Ms X that it was her bank that returned the payment as unpaid, which led to its decision to pass the debt to its enforcement agents. I have seen evidence of this returned payment from the bank. The Council is entitled to act to collect unpaid debts and so there is insufficient evidence of fault in this decision. Following Ms X’s contact, it has reviewed the situation, recalled the debt from its enforcement agent, removed added fees and agreed to reinstate the repayment arrangement. There is insufficient evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings