East Devon District Council (24 008 025)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about Council tax because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council failed to provide her with an accurate Council tax bill so that arrears were created which have caused financial distress.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. We cannot investigate the actions of bodies such as the Valuation Office Agency. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 25 and 34(1), as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints of injustice caused by ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. I have used the word fault to refer to these. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X says that she bought a property in May 2022 which had mixed planning use. She says that planning permission was granted and she bought the property that month. She says she notified the Council and a Council tax bill was issued which she paid.
  2. She says in May 2024 she received a Council tax bill for the period since she bought the house. She says that this was caused by delays by the Council.
  3. The Valuation Office Agency says that the property was a composite property at the time of purchase (both Council tax and business rates were paid based on it). The Valuation Office Agency says that they were not aware of the change at the time of purchase and say that they should have altered the liability of the building earlier but delays were caused by increased demand on the Ratings List teams.
  4. The delay has been accepted by the Valuation Office Agency in this case rather than the Council. The Valuation Office Agency is out of jurisdiction and so we cannot pursue this complaint. Further, the bill would have been issued earlier in the absence of delay and so the extra costs is not an injustice.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because the Valuation Office Agency is out of jurisdiction and there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings