Liverpool City Council (24 012 449)

Category : Adult care services > Domiciliary care

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the standard of care provided for Mr X which was arranged by the Council. The Council has already taken appropriate action to remedy the injustice caused to Mr X and it is unlikely we would achieve anything further.

The complaint

  1. Mrs Y complained that a care provider commissioned by the Council did not provide a suitable standard of care appropriate for her partner Mr X’s needs. Mrs Y wants the Council to fully refund Mr X’s fees and provide compensation.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about councils and certain other bodies. Where an individual, organisation or private company is providing services on behalf of a council, we can investigate complaints about the actions of these providers. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(1)(A) and 25(7), as amended).
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or

there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation, or

  • we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B).)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X received care from Mersey Care Julie Ann (the Care Provider) which was arranged by the Council. Mrs Y complained that there were shortfalls in Mr X’s care, including the number of individual care staff visiting, duration of visits, and the care not being of suitable quality.
  2. The Council investigated Mrs Y’s complaint and accepted there were some shortfalls in the care provided, including the large number of carers visiting and that some of the visits were shorter than expected.
  3. The Council recognised the detrimental impact of these shortfalls on Mr X and offered to reduce the care fees by 15%, in addition to a symbolic payment of £300. Mrs Y was not satisfied this properly acknowledged the impact on Mr X and brought the complaint to the Ombudsman.
  4. When we consider how to remedy injustice caused to a person, we focus on what would have happened but for any fault. Mr X would have paid his contributions to the charges for his care in any event. He has not suffered a quantifiable financial impact due to the issues raised. It therefore does not follow that the Council should fully refund him for his contributions.
  5. Mr X received care, but this did not fully meet his needs at all times which is likely to have had some detrimental effect including distress. If we investigated the matter, we would be likely to make a recommendation in the same range as the Council’s offer of £300, as it is in line with the Guidance on Remedies on our website. The Council’s offer is suitable, and we could not achieve a different outcome by investigating the matter further.
  6. The Council has engaged with its Quality Assurance Team to monitor and support the Care Provider to provide appropriate quality services, including reviewing staff training. I am satisfied with the action the Council has taken and proposes to take, and, in line with our Assessment Code, we could not achieve anything worthwhile by investigating the matter further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mrs Y’s complaint because the Council has already taken suitable action to remedy injustice caused to Mr X, and it is unlikely we would add to the Council’s investigation or achieve anything further.  

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings