Birmingham City Council (24 006 666)

Category : Adult care services > Charging

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about his late father’s care fees. The complaint is late and there is not a good reason for the delay.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the fees for his father’s care. Mr X requested a partial refund from the Council due to a hospital admission. Mr X said the Council has been dismissive of the concerns and failed to investigate his complaint until two years later. He said the matter caused him stress, and he wants the Council to reduce his father’s fees by 20% for the period he was in hospital.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X first complained to the Council in January 2023. The law says people must complain to us within 12 months of becoming aware of the matter. Mr X complained to us in July 2024. Mr X says the Council did not deal with the matter for two years; however, during this time Mr X could have brought the complaint to us sooner or escalated the issue with the Council.
  2. In any event, even if the complaint were not late, the Council waived Mr X’s father’s care fees as part of a related complaint, and it is unlikely we would have investigated the matter as we could not achieve a significantly different or worthwhile outcome.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about care fees. The complaint is late and there is not a good reason for the delay.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings