London Borough of Croydon (23 005 158)

Category : Benefits and tax > Local welfare payments

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 20 Aug 2023

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about welfare payments because there is no evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. Ms X complains that the Council unreasonably refused her a welfare payment.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Ombudsman investigates complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or may decide not to continue with an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • any injustice is not significant enough to justify our involvement, or
  • .

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Ms X had previously received welfare payments from the Council as she needed help to pay bills (such as electricity and water bills). In 2023 she made a further claim for help with her bills.
  2. The Council advised her that they could assist with £75 of shopping vouchers but could not offer more as they were prioritising those who had not received payments previously.
  3. The Council’s Welfare Payments scheme is entirely discretionary and it is a matter for the Council to decide to whom payments can be made and for what items.
  4. The Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision. If we consider it followed those processes correctly, we cannot question whether the decision was right or wrong, regardless of whether you disagree with the decision the organisation made.
  5. I am satisfied that the Council has properly considered the claim. In the absence of procedural fault, the Ombudsman cannot question that decision.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings