Westminster City Council (23 016 447)

Category : Adult care services > Assessment and care plan

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 12 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s handling of Mr X’s care and support needs. He says the Council failed to complete a proper assessment for him as the Council ignored his need for ongoing rehabilitation and physiotherapy. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault. In addition, there is another body better placed to consider the complaint.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s handling of his care and support needs. He says the Council failed to complete a proper assessment for him as the Council ignored his need for ongoing rehabilitation and physiotherapy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • there is another body better placed to consider this complaint.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X was discharged from hospital. The Council completed a care assessment to determine if Mr X had any eligible care and support needs. Mr X was assessed as having eligible needs and a care package was arranged to provide Mr X with care and support.
  2. Mr X was unhappy with the care plan as he felt the Council had ignored his need for physiotherapy. Mr X was also unhappy with the physiotherapy he had received.
  3. Physiotherapy is a health need. This means it is the responsibility of the NHS to provide this, if required. Any complaints Mr X has about the physiotherapy received, and any ongoing physiotherapy he feels he needs, is for the NHS to consider. It is open to Mr X to make this complaint to the relevant integrated care board (ICB) and then to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.
  4. Further, we will not investigate as we are not likely to find fault. This is because the Council has appropriately assessed Mr X to identify his eligible care and support needs and put in place a care package to meet these needs. The Council also noted it was happy to arrange direct payments should Mr X want this to employ someone.
  5. I appreciate Mr X feels the care assessment has not been completed appropriately as it has not identified any physiotherapy. However, as noted above, the Council is not responsible for providing this as it is a health need.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault. In addition, there is another body better placed to consider the complaint.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings