Birmingham City Council (24 014 278)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 17 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s refusal to carry out work to a streetlight. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council refused to install a shield or adjust the light on a streetlight outside his property. He says light shields have been installed outside his neighbours’ properties.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In its complaint responses, the Council outlined reasons why shields had been previously installed on other streetlights. It said this was due to lack of other options on upgraded streetlights and where light intrusion was a possibility such as on terraced houses with no driveway. Relevant to Mr X’s complaint, it explained the streetlight in question was on the opposite side of the road to his property and did not meet the criteria for a shield to be fitted. And it was unable to offer another desired option.
  2. I appreciate Mr X is unhappy, but I am satisfied the Council considered all relevant information provided and gave clear reasons for its decision. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision making, so I cannot question the merits of its decision. Therefore, I will not investigate this complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings