Recent statements in this category are shown below:
-
Royal Borough of Greenwich (24 015 379)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s communications with Ms X in relation to a planning application for a development site close to her home. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.
-
Rutland County Council (24 006 720)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We do not uphold this complaint, which asked us to consider if the Council was at fault for approving changes to a development next door to the complainant. We found no fault in the Council treating the changes as a non-material amendment to approved plans, having considered their impact on the complainant’s home.
-
Forest of Dean District Council (24 017 884)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
Elmbridge Borough Council (24 018 012)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
Charnwood Borough Council (24 015 903)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a planning application for a site close to the complainant’s home. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation.
-
London Borough of Wandsworth (24 016 497)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) liability and charges made by the Council. This is because it is reasonable for the complainant to use their rights of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate and Valuation Office Agency.
-
East Riding of Yorkshire Council (24 015 852)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 20-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with a planning application. There is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions. Nor can we achieve the outcome the complainant is ultimately seeking.
-
Leeds City Council (24 015 958)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 20-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the behaviour of a Council officer during a meeting with the complainant. This is because the complaint does not meet the tests in our Assessment Code on how we decide which complaints to investigate.
-
New Forest National Park Authority (24 016 734)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 20-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Authority’s decision to grant planning permission. It is unlikely we would find fault which could have significantly affected its decision.
-
Castle Point Borough Council (24 019 835)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 19-Feb-2025
Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint about the Council’s refusal of his planning application. This is because Mr B put in an appeal to the Planning Inspector.