Recent reports in this category are shown below:
-
Royal Borough of Greenwich (24 015 379)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s communications with Ms X in relation to a planning application for a development site close to her home. This is because we are unlikely to find evidence of fault by the Council sufficient to warrant an investigation.
-
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council (24 016 182)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s planning enforcement actions for a site on his road. Even if there has been fault by the Council, the matters complained of do not cause Mr X sufficient significant injustice to justify us investigating.
-
Rutland County Council (24 006 720)
Statement Not upheld Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We do not uphold this complaint, which asked us to consider if the Council was at fault for approving changes to a development next door to the complainant. We found no fault in the Council treating the changes as a non-material amendment to approved plans, having considered their impact on the complainant’s home.
-
Forest of Dean District Council (24 017 884)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
Elmbridge Borough Council (24 018 012)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 25-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about how the Council dealt with a planning application. This is because we are unlikely to find fault.
-
Milton Keynes Council (23 014 634)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 24-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to take planning enforcement action. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify our involvement.
-
East Lindsey District Council (24 015 587)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Enforcement 24-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s failure to approve a suitable drainage system in line with building regulations. This is because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.
-
London Borough of Southwark (24 017 474)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Other 24-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about how the Council dealt with planning matters between 2018 and 2019 because it is made late. We cannot investigate how the Council has managed work and requests for adaptations to Ms X’s leaseholder property because the law prevents us from investigating the management of housing let on long leases by councils.
-
Charnwood Borough Council (24 015 903)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council considered a planning application for a site close to the complainant’s home. We have not seen enough evidence of fault in the Council’s actions to justify an investigation.
-
London Borough of Wandsworth (24 016 497)
Statement Closed after initial enquiries Planning applications 21-Feb-2025
Summary: We will not investigate Mrs X’s complaint about Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) liability and charges made by the Council. This is because it is reasonable for the complainant to use their rights of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate and Valuation Office Agency.