Blackburn with Darwen Council (24 013 693)

Category : Planning > Planning advice

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 07 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s bias in its decision to refuse his planning application. This is because any injustice suffered is not separable from the decision itself which can be appealed to the Planning Inspectorate.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council’s decision to refuse his planning application is biased. He says it appears to have two separate policies, one for Council owned properties and the other for privately owned properties. Mr X says he has appealed the Council’s decision.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’.
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  4. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about a decision to refuse planning permission.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint. Any injustice to Mr X is due to the Council’s decision to refuse his planning application. Any bias in the Council’s decision-making process is not separate from its decision, which carries a right of appeal to the Planning Inspectorate. It is the most suitable body to review the Council’s decision.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it is reasonable for Mr X to take the matter to the Planning Inspectorate.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings