Kirklees Metropolitan Borough Council (24 016 550)

Category : Planning > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 27 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council failing to revoke a certificate of lawfulness which was based on false ownership information. The alleged fault has not affected the planning outcome, and we cannot achieve the outcome the complainant is seeking.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains the Council should revoke a certificate of lawfulness as the application form contained false information about who owned the site.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We can investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. So, we do not start an investigation if we decide:
  • any fault has not caused injustice to the person who complained, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants, or
  • there is no worthwhile outcome achievable by our investigation.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered:
    • information provided by Mr X.
    • information about the certificate of lawfulness application, available on the Council’s website.
    • the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. I appreciate Mr X is unhappy about the use which has commenced at a property close to where he lives.
  2. But the Ombudsman is not an appeal body. This means we do not take a second look at a decision to decide if it was wrong. Instead, we look at the processes an organisation followed to make its decision, and we consider if any fault we may find in those processes is likely to have affected the outcome.
  3. In other words, we will only pursue a complaint if there is clear evidence of fault in the way it has been made which, but for that fault, is likely to have led to a different decision/outcome. 
  4. The Council has explained that the ownership details included on a certificate of lawfulness application form do not affect how the planning issues are then subsequently assessed. So, even if the Council had asked the applicant to amend the ownership details, the outcome of the application would have been the same. As such, and with reference to paragraphs two and six above, we will not investigate this complaint.
  5. In addition, we also could not achieve the outcome Mr X is seeking, as we cannot direct the Council to revoke the certificate of lawfulness.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because the alleged fault has not affected the planning outcome, and we could not achieve the outcome he is seeking.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings