Nottingham City Council (24 009 767)

Category : Environment and regulation > Cemeteries and crematoria

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 31 Oct 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about an increase in memorial plaque fees. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation by the Ombudsman. We will not investigate some of Mr X’s complaint because it is late.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained the Council increased the annual cost for memorial plaques. Mr X also complained about delays in the Council’s complaint responses.
  2. Mr X said the issues impacted him financially.
  3. Mr X wants the Council to reduce the cost of the memorial plaques.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)
  2. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organization.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint that the Council increased charges for memorial plaques. In its complaint response the Council explained it had completed a public consultation and had to increase costs by 15% to maintain services. It also explained Mr X’s fees had not increased between 2021 and 2023. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation, and therefore we will not consider this complaint further.
  2. Mr X also complained about similar matters that happened in 2021, including delays in complaint responses and poor communication. These events are more than 12 months old. The law says we cannot investigate complaints older than 12 months unless we decide there are good reasons. If Mr X was dissatisfied at the time, he could have brought a complaint to the Ombudsman sooner. I have seen no good reasons Mr X could not have brought the complaint to us sooner. Therefore, we will not investigate this complaint.
  3. In any event, the Council used its discretion to waive his fee in 2021. Therefore, it resolved the primary issue at the time and an investigation would be unlikely to achieve anything further.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation. We will not investigate some of Mr X’s complaint because it is late.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings