Essex County Council (24 012 867)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Upheld

Decision date : 20 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We have upheld this complaint because the Council delayed carrying out an Education Health and Care needs assessment for a child. The Council has agreed to resolve the complaint by offering to make a suitable payment to the complainant to remedy the injustice this caused.

The complaint

  1. Miss X complains that the Council has delayed completed an Education Health and Care (EHC) needs assessment for her child.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’. In this statement, I have used the word fault to refer to these. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we are satisfied with the actions an organisation has taken or proposes to take. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(7), as amended)
  2. Under our information sharing agreement, we will share this decision with the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills (Ofsted).

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. If we were to investigate this complaint it is likely that we would find fault. This is because the Council has delayed completing its EHC needs assessment by around a year to date. It says this is due to the national shortage of Educational Psychologists.
  2. We have recently upheld other complaints about delays with the Council completing EHC needs assessments due to the national shortage of Educational Psychologists and we are satisfied that the Council is taking steps to resolve this issue, and so have therefore not recommended anything further recommendations in regard to this point. 
  3. However, the delays have caused Miss X distress in the form of frustration and uncertainty.
  4. I therefore asked the Council to write to Miss X within one month to apologise for the delays and to offer her a payment of £1200 to remedy the distress this has caused to date. I also asked the Council to offer to make a further payment to Miss X once it makes an appealable decision, either not to issue an EHC Plan or when an EHC Plan is issued. This payment should be calculated at £100 per month from the date of this decision until the date of the appealable decision. To its credit, the Council agreed.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We have upheld Miss X’s complaint. The Council has agreed to resolve the matter by providing a suitable remedy.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings