Central Bedfordshire Council (24 011 711)

Category : Education > Special educational needs

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Dec 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the handling of her son’s education. Miss X has appealed to the First-Tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability). This places the complaint outside our jurisdiction.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Miss X, complained about her son’s education. Miss X’s son has an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHC Plan). Miss X says the school named in the EHC Plan is unsuitable. Miss X says this has left her son without a suitable education.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a tribunal about the same matter. We also cannot investigate a complaint if in doing so we would overlap with the role of a tribunal to decide something which has been or could have been referred to it to resolve using its own powers. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(a), as amended)
  3. The First-tier Tribunal (Special Educational Needs and Disability) considers appeals against council decisions regarding special educational needs. We refer to it as the SEND Tribunal in this decision statement.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We will not start an investigation into Miss X’s complaint.
  2. It is not for us to take a view on whether the content of an EHC Plan is appropriate. This matter carries a right of appeal to the SEND Tribunal. This is the proper route by which to challenge the school named in an EHC Plan. Miss X has used this right.
  3. Where appeal rights have been used, the matter is outside our jurisdiction from the point at which the appeal rights were available until the SEND Tribunal issues its decision. Miss X says her child is out of school because the Council named an inappropriate school. The Council disagrees. This issue is too closely linked to the matter appealed and so we cannot consider it. We have no jurisdiction to consider Miss X’s complaint and so we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint because she has used her right of appeal. This places the complaint outside our jurisdiction.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings