Direct payments


Recent statements in this category are shown below:

  • Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council (24 013 377)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 10-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Miss X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to end her friend’s direct payments. This is because she is not a suitable representative to bring this complaint on her friend’s behalf.

  • West Sussex County Council (24 014 299)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 06-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about a Council decision that it no longer considers a person suitable to manage his relative’s direct payment. There is insufficient evidence of fault to warrant an investigation and further investigation would not lead to a different outcome.

  • Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (24 012 946)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 05-Feb-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to suspend direct payments for his two adult children. The Council has thoroughly investigated Mr X’s concerns and we could not add to its response or achieve the outcome he wants

  • Hampshire County Council (24 007 049)

    Statement Upheld Direct payments 29-Jan-2025

    Summary: Miss X complains the Council failed to promptly pay direct payments for care she received while she was abroad, and there was a delay in restarting her care package. We found there was no evidence the Council agreed to pay Direct Payments and this had since been remedied by a retrospective payment in any event. However, we found Miss X was avoidably left without care on her return from abroad due to Service Failure and Fault by the Council, so a payment should be made to recognise this. The Council should also provide better communication for service users about the correct process to follow in situation where care is to be suspended and restarted.

  • Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council (24 013 051)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 23-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s decision to suspend direct payments to her. The Council has thoroughly investigated Ms X’s concerns and we could not add to its response nor achieve the outcome Ms X wants.

  • Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (24 012 970)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 22-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint about the Council’s decision not to exercise discretion to disregard his share of a property for all means tested benefits and financial assessments. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault.

  • Westminster City Council (24 002 126)

    Statement Not upheld Direct payments 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: Ms X complained about the Council’s response to her request for direct payments and related matters. We did not find the Council to be at fault. It responded to her requests for information, additional care and repayment appropriately.

  • South Gloucestershire Council (24 012 572)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 17-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint about the Council’s handling of her direct payments. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council (24 013 513)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 16-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint the Council refused his direct payments application for a personal assistant. We would be unlikely to find fault with how the Council made its decision.

  • Lancashire County Council (24 008 289)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Direct payments 13-Jan-2025

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a remedy payment from the Council impacting Miss X’s apparent financial circumstances in the following tax year. We could not achieve the outcome Miss X seeks, and it is open to her to pursue the matter via the courts, if necessary, or alternatively with His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings