South Gloucestershire Council (21 007 734)

Category : Housing > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Oct 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s payment for repairs to a property it leased from Ms X. This is because it would be reasonable to expect her to use the court remedy available to her.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, who I refer to as Ms X, says the Council should pay a sum higher than that offered to address disrepair issues in a property she owns and had leased out to the Council. She says it has not fulfilled the terms of the lease and is responsible for further repairs and damage.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Ms X, including the Council’s response to her complaint.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. When Ms X took back the property she had leased to the Council, it was not in the same state of repair as it had been at the beginning of their arrangement.
  2. The Council offered Ms X a payment of about one sixth of what she says the damages and costs were. While Ms X took this payment, she says she was unaware it was an offer made in full and final settlement and that the Council should pay more. The Council has advised Ms X that if she is unhappy with the amount it has paid, she can pursue an insurance claim against it.
  3. The restriction highlighted at paragraph 2 applies to this complaint because if Ms X remains dissatisfied with the response she receives to her claim, she can take the matter to court. As she has this alternative remedy available which we would reasonably expect her to use, the complaint falls outside our jurisdiction and will not be pursued.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Ms X’s complaint because it would be reasonable to expect her to use the court remedy available to her.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings