Cumbria, Northumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust (21 010 564a)

Category : Health > Mental health services

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 26 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: The Ombudsman cannot consider a complaint about a Council’s actions in relation to safeguarding procedures and accommodation support because it is late.

The complaint

  1. Mrs D complains on behalf of her son, Mr E about the actions of South Tyneside Council (the Council). She complains about the Council’s:
    • failure to communicate with her about Mr E’s care
    • failure to invite family to a safeguarding strategy meeting in 2019 or communicate the outcome;
    • reluctance to arrange a supported living placement for Mr E.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse effect on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We may decide not to start an investigation if the tests set out in our Assessment Code are not met. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended)
  2. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.
  3. The complainant had the opportunity to comment on a draft of my decision statement.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mrs D complained to the Council in May 2019 about communication around a safeguarding strategy meeting and what she felt was the Council’s reluctance to arrange alternative accommodation for Mr E.
  2. The Council responded to Mrs D in September 2019. Mrs D made no further contact with the Council. However she was pursuing other complaints about Mr E’s mental healthcare with the NHS. Mrs E raised concerns about accommodation with the NHS Trust, but it clarified in a response in October 2019 that this was the Council’s responsibility. Further correspondence with the NHS Trust related to its clinical decision making and care management about Mr D’s care.
  3. Mrs E did not make any further complaints to the Council and she did not bring her complaint to the Ombudsman until after September 2020. I have seen no reason that would have prevented Mrs E from bringing the complaint about the Council to the Ombudsman sooner.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint about the Council because it is late and there are no good reasons to consider it now.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings