London Borough of Islington (23 019 049)

Category : Environment and regulation > Trees

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 04 Mar 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint that a tree at a Council property is causing damage to his property. This is because we cannot investigate complaints about the management of social housing by councils.

The complaint

  1. Mr B complains a very large tree at the adjoining Council property is causing damage to his property. Mr B says the Council has ignored his correspondence and complaint about this. Mr B would like the Council to repair the damage to his property and to regularly maintain this tree to prevent further damage.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the provision or management of social housing by a council acting as a registered social housing provider. (Local Government Act 1974, paragraph 5A schedule 5, as amended)
  3. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone could take the matter to court. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to go to court. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(c), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr B.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr B’s complaint is about the Council’s management of the adjoining property which is owned by the Council.
  2. We cannot investigate complaints about the management of social housing by a council acting as a social landlord. This restriction applies to complaints which are about the maintenance and management of property buildings, gardens, trees or boundary features.
  3. This restriction also applies to the Council’s handling of Mr B’s correspondence about this issue.
  4. This means we cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint and have no discretion to start an investigation.
  5. But, even if we had the power to investigate, we would not start an investigation into Mr B’s complaint. This is because we take the view that complaints about property damage are best decided by the Council’s insurers and ultimately the courts.
  6. Because of the seriousness of the issue complained about, it is reasonable to expect Mr B to put in a claim to the Council’s insurers, and if needed, take the Council to court. Mr B may be able to get the help of his building insurer to pursue a claim as he has done in the past.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate Mr B’s complaint because it is about the management of social housing by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings