Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council (21 006 394)

Category : Environment and regulation > Antisocial behaviour

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 16 Sep 2021

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about a high hedge remedial notice. Mr X exercised his right of appeal against the notice to the Planning Inspectorate which is the proper body to consider these matters.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complained about the Council’s refusal to implement terms of a remedial notice on a neighbour’s hedge which was confirmed in 2007. He says the hedge exceeds the height specified in the notice and should be cut lower.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b))
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint if someone has appealed to a government minister. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of a government minister. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. We cannot investigate late complaints unless we decide there are good reasons. Late complaints are when someone takes more than 12 months to complain to us about something a council/care provider has done. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 26B and 34D, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says the Council has failed to implement a remedial notice which it created in 2007 following his complaint about the height of a neighbour’s hedge. He appealed the notice conditions to the Planning Inspectorate when it was served in 2007 but his appeal was not upheld.
  2. In 2015 he says he became aware that the neighbour had breached the notice conditions and had a private survey carried out in 2019 which he says confirmed this. He appealed to the Planning Inspectorate again in 2020 but the authority told him that it does not consider cases older than 12 months.
  3. We cannot consider complaints about matters which carry a right of appeal to a government minister and the complainant has exercised that right. The rejection of his appeal is the Planning Inspectorate’s decision, and this is not a matter which we can investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We cannot investigate this complaint about a high hedge remedial notice. Mr X exercised his right of appeal against the notice to the Planning Inspectorate which is the proper body to consider these matters.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings