London Borough of Croydon (21 014 411)

Category : Benefits and tax > Council tax

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 28 Jan 2022

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We cannot investigate this complaint about alleged fraud. This is because Miss Y’s complaint relates to matters which have been considered by the courts.

The complaint

  1. Miss Y complains the Council wrongly framed her for fraud, seized over £22,000 of her money and taken other property belonging to her. She also complains that the Council falsified court documents.
  2. Miss Y says she feels violated, upset and has suffered significantly emotionally and financially as a result of the Council’s actions.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. The Local Government Act 1974 sets out our powers but also imposes restrictions on what we can investigate.
  2. We cannot investigate a complaint about the start of court action or what happened in court. (Local Government Act 1974, Schedule 5/5A, paragraph 1/3, as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Miss Y provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Miss Y’s complaint relates to the Council’s involvement in a fraud investigation in 2013. As part of the investigation money was seized and other property including passports, sim cards and letters were taken in evidence. In 2017, a court hearing found the money taken was to be forfeited.
  2. Miss Y has since, in 2021, instructed solicitors to have items returned to her. Some of these items were destroyed, the Council says, in accordance with court decisions. Miss Y is unhappy that items such as the large sum of money that was seized has not been returned to her. She says this was claimed fairly and is hers.

Analysis

  1. We cannot investigate Miss Y’s complaint as it is about the start of court action where evidence was taken and what happened in court. The remainder of Miss Y’s complaint is inextricably linked to the court proceedings as it relates to the return of items which were removed as evidence in the proceedings, especially where such items are subject to orders by the court. Consequently, we will not investigate this complaint as the law prevents us from doing so.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Miss Y’s complaint because the complaint relates to matters already considered by the courts.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings