Allocations archive 2021-2022


Archive has 418 results

  • Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (21 018 135)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 30-Mar-2022

    Summary: Ms X complains that despite being statutorily overcrowded, the Council has not moved her to larger accommodation. We will not investigate the complaint because there is no evidence of fault in how the Council has dealt with her case sufficient to warrant investigation.

  • London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (21 015 960)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 30-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s failure to provide Ms X with housing. There is not enough evidence of fault to warrant an investigation. Also, part of the complaint is late and there are no good reasons to exercise our discretion and investigate.

  • London Borough of Hackney (21 016 672)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 30-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the housing register because there is insufficient evidence of injustice and because part of the complaint is late.

  • Buckinghamshire Council (21 006 251)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 29-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the way the Council dealt with the complainant’s her housing application. This is because we could not add anything significant to the Council’s response to her complaint.

  • London Borough of Tower Hamlets (21 006 331)

    Statement Upheld Allocations 29-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mr X complains the Council rejected his application for the housing register and did not correctly apply its allocations policy. This meant his application was refused rather than assessed. The Ombudsman finds fault with the Council for how it handled communication about Mr X’s application and his complaint. The Council has agreed to pay financial remedy in recognition of the distress caused to Mr X and consider service improvements. The Ombudsman does not fault with the Council for how its allocation policy was applied.

  • London Borough of Wandsworth (21 006 909)

    Statement Not upheld Allocations 27-Mar-2022

    Summary: Mrs Y complains about the length of time she has been in Band A under the Council’s housing allocations scheme. We do not find the Council at fault for not making an offer of housing. It has followed its housing allocations scheme and given the application a high priority. It has not made an offer due to the shortage of accommodation.

  • London Borough of Barking & Dagenham (21 015 957)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 27-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s assessment of Mr X’s housing application. There is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

  • West Suffolk Council (21 018 049)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 27-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s decision to reduce her priority on her housing application and to end its duty to rehouse here. This is because she had a right of appeal to court and it was reasonable to expect her to use this.

  • Birmingham City Council (21 017 490)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 25-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council not allowing the complainant to join the housing register. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault in how the Council reached its decision.

  • London Borough of Waltham Forest (21 017 775)

    Statement Closed after initial enquiries Allocations 25-Mar-2022

    Summary: We will not exercise discretion to investigate Ms X’s complaint about a housing transfer in 2016. This was received outside the normal 12-month period for investigating complaints. There is no evidence to suggest that Ms X could not have complained to us sooner. We will not investigate the assessment of Ms X’s current housing application because there is insufficient evidence of fault which would warrant an investigation.

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings