Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead Council (24 018 983)

Category : Transport and highways > Street furniture and lighting

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 13 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s refusal to remove an advertisement banner near a pedestrian crossing. There is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about the Council’s refusal to remove an advertisement banner near a pedestrian crossing. He says this is a safety issue for pedestrians and drivers.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. In response to Mr X’s report, the Council said an inspector visited the site and found the issue was not at a level requiring action at the time. It told Mr X it would monitor the site regularly in line with its Highway Maintenance Management Plan for any deterioration.
  1. I appreciate Mr X is unhappy but there is not enough evidence of fault in the Council’s decision-making. The Council investigated the issue and explained its decision not to take immediate action clearly. It reassured Mr X that it would monitor the site regularly. I cannot question the merits of the Council’s decision when there is not enough evidence of fault in its decision making. Therefore, I will not investigate Mr X’s complaint.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings