London Borough of Hillingdon (24 010 793)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 11 Nov 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about a dropped kerb because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

The complaint

  1. Mr Y complained the Council has failed to complete a fully dropped kerb outside his and his neighbour’s property.
  2. Mr Y says this means that people still park over the raised kerb section outside his property, causing him inconvenience.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating. (Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. We cannot question whether a council’s decision is right or wrong simply because the complainant disagrees with it. We must consider whether there was fault in the way the decision was reached. (Local Government Act 1974, section 34(3), as amended)

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information Mr Y and the Council provided and the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. We consider whether there was fault in the way an organisation made its decision. If there was no fault in how the organisation made its decision, we cannot question the outcome.
  2. In this case, the Council has considered the site, taken measurements and considered it policy. It has also considered the likelihood it would grant any further dropping of the kerb if the neighbour were to apply for this in the future. It has made its conclusions based on relevant criteria so the decision has been made properly without fault in the decision-making process. As there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, we will not investigate.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr Y’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings