West Sussex County Council (24 006 692)

Category : Transport and highways > Parking and other penalties

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 10 Sep 2024

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about an unsuccessful application for a disabled parking bay. This is because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

The complaint

  1. The complainant, Mr X, complains about the Council’s decision not to provide a disabled parking bay. He has a drive but the family struggles to park as there are two adults with Blue Badges. Mr X wants a parking bay.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service, but must use public money carefully. We do not start an investigation if we decide there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr X and the Council. This includes the correspondence about the parking bay, the parking bay policy and a photograph of Mr X’s drive. I also considered our Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Council’s policy says a person cannot have a disabled parking bay if they have off-street parking.
  2. Mr X applied for a disabled parking bay. The Council refused the application because Mr X has a driveway. Mr X appealed and said there are two Blue Badge holders in the family. In response, the Council confirmed he is ineligible for a bay because there is a drive which appears to be big enough for two cars.
  3. I will not start an investigation because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council. The policy says people with access to off-street parking cannot have a bay. I have looked at a photograph of Mr X’s house which shows he has a drive which is long enough for two, and possibly three, cars. Mr X disagrees with the decision but as the Council’s decision reflects the policy there is no reason to start an investigation. We are not an appeal body and we cannot intervene simply because a council makes a decision that someone disagrees with.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate this complaint because there is insufficient evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings