London Borough of Brent (24 017 737)

Category : Planning > Enforcement

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 05 Feb 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about planning enforcement as there was an appeal to a Planning Inspector against the notice and a fine could be challenged in court.

The complaint

  1. Mr X complains about a fine levied against him following a planning enforcement notice for an unauthorised demolition.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We have the power to start or end an investigation into a complaint about actions the law allows us to investigate. We may decide not to start or continue with an investigation if we think the issues could reasonably be, or have been mentioned as part of the legal proceedings regarding a closely related matter. (Local Government Act 1974, sections 24A(6) and 34B(8), as amended, section 34(B))
  2. The law says we cannot normally investigate a complaint when someone can appeal to a government minister. However, we may decide to investigate if we consider it would be unreasonable to expect the person to appeal. (Local Government Act 1974, section 26(6)(b), as amended)
  3. The Planning Inspector acts on behalf of the responsible Government minister. The Planning Inspector considers appeals about a planning enforcement notice.

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by the complainant and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. Mr X says that the Council, through the courts, levied a fine against him which he says is disproportionate. The fine was for unauthorised demolition work.
  2. Councils have a range of options for formal planning enforcement action available to them, including a Planning Enforcement Notice where there is evidence of a breach, to identify it and require action to remedy it. There is a right of appeal against the notice to a Planning Inspector. The Planning Inspectorate is an independent body which can determine any dispute about such decisions. I see no reason why an appeal could not be made in this case and so this part of the complaint is out of jurisdiction.
  3. The Council can also take a person, subject to the notice, to court which can issue a fine against them. Mr X says that the fine is excessive but this was a matter for the court and so is out of jurisdiction.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr X’s complaint because it could be appealed to a Planning Inspector and was a matter for the court.

Investigator’s decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings