Worcestershire County Council (24 012 143)

Category : Other Categories > Other

Decision : Closed after initial enquiries

Decision date : 23 Jan 2025

The Ombudsman's final decision:

Summary: We will not investigate this complaint about the Council’s management of Mr C’s money. There is not enough evidence of fault by the Council. The Court appointed the Council to manage Mr C’s money and only the Court can change that arrangement.

The complaint

  1. Mr C says the Council has taken away his free choice by giving him a bank card that he cannot use on things he wishes, such as a dating site. Mr C also thinks he should be allowed to manage his own money. Mr C feels unhappy.

Back to top

The Ombudsman’s role and powers

  1. We investigate complaints about ‘maladministration’ and ‘service failure’, which we call ‘fault’. We must also consider whether any fault has had an adverse impact on the person making the complaint, which we call ‘injustice’. We provide a free service but must use public money carefully. We do not start or continue an investigation if we decide:
  • there is not enough evidence of fault to justify investigating, or
  • we could not add to any previous investigation by the organisation, or
  • further investigation would not lead to a different outcome, or
  • we cannot achieve the outcome someone wants.

(Local Government Act 1974, section 24A(6), as amended, section 34(B))

Back to top

How I considered this complaint

  1. I considered information provided by Mr C and the Council.
  2. I considered the Ombudsman’s Assessment Code.

Back to top

My assessment

  1. The Court of Protection decided Mr C needed someone to manage his money. The Ombudsman has no powers to challenge decisions made by the Court. Mr C would need to go back to the Court of Protection for it to decide if he can manage his own money. Meanwhile, there is no fault in the Council managing Mr C’s money.
  2. The Council agrees the bank card has limits. It is working with Mr C to find a way for him to still access things like the dating site. The Council suggested it could transfer money into Mr C’s bank account for him to spend on the dating site.

Back to top

Final decision

  1. We will not investigate Mr C’s complaint because there is not enough evidence of fault by the Council.

Back to top

Investigator's decision on behalf of the Ombudsman

Print this page

LGO logogram

Review your privacy settings

Required cookies

These cookies enable the website to function properly. You can only disable these by changing your browser preferences, but this will affect how the website performs.

View required cookies

Analytical cookies

Google Analytics cookies help us improve the performance of the website by understanding how visitors use the site.
We recommend you set these 'ON'.

View analytical cookies

In using Google Analytics, we do not collect or store personal information that could identify you (for example your name or address). We do not allow Google to use or share our analytics data. Google has developed a tool to help you opt out of Google Analytics cookies.

Privacy settings